top of page

CRIT 2 Reviews

  • Writer: JOBEL CHUA LI JUAN  / UPM
    JOBEL CHUA LI JUAN / UPM
  • Jun 10, 2020
  • 1 min read

Comments received from panel members

ree

List of Comments

  1. Missing design concept for the project. There is a gap from urban design to the proposed project.

  2. Need improvement on the narration.

  3. Building design is too tedious, there should be more bold

  4. Missing the essence/ sense of place in design

  5. Lack of complexity

The comments emphasizes more on the missing concept of design and also the narrations. All comments are valid and acceptable except for comment "3". In my opinion, designing in a historical site, the design should respond and respect it's surrounding. Design within a historic town with more bold and at odd would destroy the fabric of the town itself. At worst, it would even destroy the identity and sense of place of Sungai Lembing. However, at the same time i do agree that there is more room for development on the design of the building to incorporate with more of the essence of the place. As for lack of complexity, a more detail study will be carry out on how to conserve and regeneration could be implemented. Diagram the interventions and showing the new experiences administer in the proposal.



Comments


bottom of page